What model do workflows in CrowdStrike Falcon follow?

Workflows in CrowdStrike Falcon follow the Trigger, Condition, Action model, which is a widely recognized framework for creating automated processes. In this model, a "Trigger" serves as the starting point for a workflow; it represents an event that initiates the response. Next is the "Condition," which is a set of parameters or criteria that must be met for the workflow to proceed. Finally, the "Action" is the execution of a specific operation based on the fulfillment of the Condition. This structure allows users to create clear, logical sequences for automation tasks, ensuring that processes run efficiently and effectively in response to specific events.

This model is particularly useful in cybersecurity contexts, where the quick and automatic response to threats can be critical. By using this approach, organizations can streamline their incident response operations and enhance their overall security posture.

The other options, while they may seem conceptually similar, do not capture the specifics of how CrowdStrike Falcon defines its workflows. For instance, "Initiator, Condition, Response" introduces a different terminology that does not precisely align with the functions of the CrowdStrike framework. Similarly, "Event, Condition, Outcome" and "Trigger, Action, Result" also deviate from the established terminology that CrowdStrike uses to describe